ARTICLES

Cattle Grazing Affects Peanut Root Characteristics in a Bahiagrass-Based Crop Rotation System

Authors: S.S. Sidhu , S. George , D.L. Rowland , W. Faircloth , J.J. Marois , D.L. Wright

  • Cattle Grazing Affects Peanut Root Characteristics in a Bahiagrass-Based Crop Rotation System

    ARTICLES

    Cattle Grazing Affects Peanut Root Characteristics in a Bahiagrass-Based Crop Rotation System

    Authors: , , , , ,

Abstract

The critical aspect of production agriculture in the southeastern US with increasing associated costs is to improve economic and agronomic sustainability. A four yr sod-based rotation system consisting of two yr of bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum Flueggé) (grazed or non-grazed) followed by a yr of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) and a yr of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), each with winter cover crop (grazed or non-grazed) was established in Marianna, FL. The effect of grazing on root parameters (length, volume, surface area, and diameter) of peanut was observed using a mini-rhizotron. There were differences in several root parameters between grazed and non-grazed plots including: peanut root length (307 mm in grazed vs 167 mm in non-grazed), volume (50 mm3 in grazed vs. 23 mm3 in non-grazed), surface area (399 mm2 in grazed vs. 197 mm2 in non-grazed), and diameter (2.4 mm in grazed vs. 1.7 mm in non-grazed). Roots at the 45-60 cm and 60-75 cm depths had significantly greater length in the grazed than the non-grazed plots. Likewise, surface area was significantly greater in the grazed plots at the 30-45 cm, 45-60 cm and 60-75 cm depths. Grazed plots at the 40-65 cm depths showed significant increase in root diameter. No significant difference in peanut yield was observed for the grazed or non-grazed treatments. A more developed root system associated with cattle grazing in the sod-based rotation system may enable peanuts to be more resilient in adverse environmental conditions such as drought stress, enhance nutrient cycling without affecting yield, thereby improving long-term sustainability.

Keywords: bahiagrass, cattle, peanut, Arachis hypogaea L., grazing, mini-rhizotron, root architecture, water use efficiency

How to Cite:

Sidhu, S. & George, S. & Rowland, D. & Faircloth, W. & Marois, J. & Wright, D., (2018) “Cattle Grazing Affects Peanut Root Characteristics in a Bahiagrass-Based Crop Rotation System”, Peanut Science 45(2), p.75-81. doi: https://doi.org/10.3146/0095-3679-45.2.75

59 Views

0 Downloads

Published on
01 Jul 2018
Peer Reviewed

Introduction

The consolidation of smaller farms into larger farms along with a shift to forestry-based applications and pine production has led to a decline in the number of farms in the southeastern US (Marois et al., 2002). This situation provides an opportunity and necessitates the development of robust cropping systems through environmentally friendly agricultural practices that are profitable and sustainable. These cropping systems must be profitable for small farms by increasing the yields and by maintaining or decreasing production costs. Improved financial benefits from new cropping systems will enable small farms to be competitive (Wright et al., 2007). Integrated crop-livestock production systems provide opportunities for greater diversification and yr round utilization of resources thereby mitigating risk, and providing environmental benefits such as nutrient cycling and energy efficiency impacting overall farm profitability (Clark, 2004; Entz et al., 2005; Hanson and Franzluebbers, 2008; Tanaka et al., 2005). Several studies integrating crop and livestock have indicated an increase in total nitrogen, soil organic C (carbon), soil microbial biomass C, water-soluble aggregate stability, and a decrease in penetration resistance (Acosta-Martinez et al., 2004; Maughan et al., 2009).

Bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum Flueggé) has been utilized in reduced tillage systems (sod-based rotations) in the Southeast Coastal Plains (Wright et al., 2005). Deep-rooted bahiagrass leaves soil channels after the decay of bahiagrass roots for the subsequent summer crop to develop roots in these channels (Elkins et al., 1977). Soil quality is also improved by presence of yr-round soil cover, greater water infiltration, reduction in NO3- leaching, and soil erosion (Reeves, 1997). Additional benefits of including bahiagrass, a non-host for most of the row crop pests, in the cropping system includes reduction of weeds, nematodes, and diseases and reduced pesticide applications (Katsvairo et al., 2007a; Liebman and Dyck, 1993; Marois, 2003; Sumner, 1982; Tsigbey et al., 2009). Establishment of bahiagrass in the cropping systems has several positive impacts on the soil physical and chemical properties and may often lead to improved crop yields (Brenneman et al., 2003; Katsvairo et al., 2006; Toth, 1998). Also, an increase in earthworm populations (Katsvairo et al., 2007b), organic matter and improved soil structure (Swift and Noordwijk, 2004) has been observed in this system.

Growers are able to benefit from additional income during the yr bahiagrass is present in the rotation through utilization of livestock to graze these areas. Land associated with crop production is rented at a higher price than pasture land. As 80% of the crop land in the U.S. is rented, adoption of sod-based practices strictly for grazing was hindered. However, a row crop production system including a sod-based rotation with grazing as a component may provide benefits of bahiagrass along with the economic benefits.

The University of Florida, North Florida Research and Education Center (NFREC) has been evaluating benefits of grazing by cattle (Bos taurus L) in the sod-based rotations to evaluate the economic sustainability of these systems. Peanut grown in the sod-based rotation system with cattle grazing has shown higher yields with reduced costs (Marois et al., 2002). Grazing in a sod-based rotation system has also shown increased root development (Loison et al., 2012), enhanced microbial and enzyme activity and nutrient recycling (Anguelov et al., 2011; Vendramini et al., 2007; Wright et al., 2010; George et al., 2013).

However, grazing of cattle can adversely impact the soil profile by increasing soil compaction which may negatively impact root development of the subsequent summer crop. Wright et al. (2010) observed an increase in soil bulk density of the top 10 to 15 cm soil profile due to grazing in comparison to the non-grazed plots. An increase in the bulk density of top 10 to 15 cm soil profile due to cattle grazing was also reported by Bell et al. (2011). However, negative impacts of animal traffic on soil physical characteristics can be mitigated by increase in organic matter content due to perennial grass use and conservation tillage (Franzluebbers and Stuedemann, 2008). Franzluebbers (2007) in his review of the status of integrated crop-livestock systems in the southeastern U.S concluded that there were great opportunities for crop-livestock integration in this region and that research emphasizing the consequences of these systems was limited. Agronomic and economic benefits for the growers can be expected with the adaptation of crop-livestock systems despite the low adoption and management challenges (Franzluebbers and Stuedemann, 2008). We integrated cattle grazing with sod-based rotation systems (2 yr of bahiagrass followed by peanut then cotton) to understand the short- and long-term effects of grazing on soil properties and crop yield.

The objective of this study was to analyze the impact of prior grazing on subsequent peanut root development in a sod-based crop rotation. Peanut crop grown subsequent to bahiagrass may develop a better root system but the negative impacts of soil compaction caused by livestock traffic may counteract some of these benefits. Therefore, it became imperative to quantify the impacts of cattle grazing on the root architecture of peanut.

Materials and Methods

Experimental Site and Crop Rotation

The experiment was located in Marianna (Jackson County), Florida, on the University of Florida-NFREC-Marianna station (N 30°52'25", W 85°10'56"). The soil was an Ultisol composed of coarse sand and loamy coarse sand on the top 80 cm, coarse sandy loam and sandy clay loam at depths 80 to 110 cm and sandy clay loam at 110 to 200 cm depths (Soil Survey Jackson County FL, 1979). The study consisted of a sod-based rotation system where bahiagrass was established for the first two yr followed by peanut and then cotton. The study was established under a 56 ha center pivot irrigation system divided into 4 equal quadrants. Each quadrant contained one component of the rotation so that all crops of the rotation were present in every yr (Fig. 1). The non-irrigated area (corners) amount to 2.0 ha in each quadrant. Every yr each quadrant changed crop to the following phase based on aforementioned rotation.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.

The sod-based rotation under a center pivot system at the experimental site in Marianna, FL, showing arrangement of exclusion cages and crop in each quadrant.

Exclusion Cages, Grazing, and Crop Management

In the fall of 2006, large exclusion cages (16 m x 16 m) were fenced off in the rotation scheme where cattle were not allowed to graze, non-grazed (NG) treatment, the bahiagrass and winter cover crops (oats/rye) (Fig.1). Global Positioning System coordinates for the exclusion cages were obtained at first installation so that the fence could be erected at the same location following each crop sequence when cattle are on winter (oats/rye mixture) or summer (bahiagrass) grazing. Fences were taken down to allow timely management of non-grazed areas such as cutting hay, planting of winter grazing and row crops. Outside each exclusion cage, a similar sized plot was established at a distance of 3 m without a fence where cattle grazing was allowed, grazed (G) treatment. The experiment was repeated for three yr with peanut crop grown in a different quadrant each yr as per the aforementioned crop rotation. For more information on experimental design, see George et al. (2013).

The rotation system initiated with overseeding of bahiagrass into a grazed oats/rye cover with a grain drill in February and March. In this quadrant, cattle were removed from the field and grazing was discontinued for six weeks around mid-May to help bahiagrass establishment. Grazing was allowed again on bahiagrass starting early to mid-July and was continued through second yr. Cattle were removed from the field during planting of winter cover crops and were returned for grazing after planting. During first yr fall, annual ryegrass was overseeded with Hay Van no-till drill for winter grazing. During fall of second yr, bahiagrass was killed with glyphosate (Roundup Power Max, Monsanto, St. Louis, MO) followed by planting of oats/rye cover crop mixture for winter grazing from late October till late April to early May when cotton and peanut, respectively, were planted. The bahiagrass was followed by peanut and then cotton in the subsequent first and second summer, respectively. Each fall peanut and cotton were followed by oats/rye winter cover crop mixture, which were grazed. Cattle were managed as a controlled "put and take" grazing system with varying stocking rate. In 2007, there were 1.5 cow/calf pairs per hectare during both winter and summer grazing periods. Cattle were unable to keep up with the aggressive growth of the forage and excess forage was produced in the first yr. In the remaining yr of the study, put and take animals were used to maintain a stocking rate of 2.2 cow/calf pairs per hectare in 2008-2010. Hay was cut from both bahiagrass and winter grazing if excess forage was accumulated each yr.

All crops were planted using conservation tillage methods (strip tillage) unless fields were deemed too rough after winter grazing, thus the field had to be tilled to allow for good soil/seed contact. Information of crop varieties used for this study and planting and harvesting date is given in Table 1. University of Florida Extension recommendations were used for peanut management (Wright et al., 2016). Following harvest peanut residues were disk harrowed twice before being planted to oats/rye. Annual ryegrass was over seeded into first yr bahiagrass for winter grazing using a Hay Van no-till drill. The winter grazing cover crop (oats/rye) was broadcast planted in plots where the preceding crop was cotton, or seeded with a grain drill into plots where peanut or second yr bahiagrass was the preceding crop. Winter cover crop was terminated each yr using glyphosate (depending on amount of residue left after grazing) in early May prior to planting peanut. Peanut yield was measured in both grazed and non-grazed plots.

Table 1.
Table 1.

Crop variety, planting dates, harvesting dates, and termination dates during 2007-2010 during sod-based rotation (bahiagrass-bahiagrass-peanut-cotton)

Peanuts did not receive any fertilization and were managed for any foliar disease. Cotton was fertilized at rate of 26.9 kg/ha N and 44.8 kg/ha P at planting; 89.6 kg/ha N and 156.9 kg/ha K at 30 days after planting (DAP); and 56 kg/ha N at 55 DAP. Bahiagrass was fertilized in May and July at the rates of 44.8 kg/ha N and 84 kg/ha N during first yr and at the rate of 44.8kg/ha and 56 kg/ha N during second yr, respectively. A pre-plant fertilization at the rate of 67.2 kg/ha N, 44.8 kg/ha P, 89.6 kg/ha K and a 67.2kg/ha N at 60 DAP was applied for Anuual ryegrass.

Measurement of Root Growth

Mini-rhizotrons consisting of 1.8 m long with a 5 cm internal diameter transparent tubes (Bartz Technology Corp., Santa Barbara, CA) were installed at a 45° angle with the soil surface. Tubes were installed in each of the grazed and non-grazed areas using a probe and auger assembly mounted on a tractor. The tubes were installed parallel and within a peanut row and the first plant in the row under the tube was approximately 5-10 cm away from the point of tube insertion. The tubes were inserted to a depth of 1 m into the soil with approximately 1.4 m of the tube inserted. Images were taken by inserting a camera (BTC 2, Bartz Technology Corp., Santa Barbara, CA) into the tubes. The camera was attached to an indexing handle system that permitted images to be taken repeatedly over time at the same locations. The digital images were saved 1.35 cm along the length of the tube. The field of view for the camera was 1.35 cm vertical x 1.8 cm horizontal. A removable cap was placed and a black color was coated on the protruding end of each tube to prevent light and moisture from entering the tube. In 2007 and 2008, the measurement dates were mid-June, mid-July, mid-August, and mid-September. In 2009, measurements were made only in mid-August and mid-September.

Images were analyzed using WINRHIZOTRON MF V.2005a software (Regent Instruments Inc., Canada). Root measurements were accomplished by tracing each root in a given image and adjusting diameters accordingly (Patena and Ingram, 2000). Total root length (root length), total root volume (root volume), total root surface area (root surface area), and average root diameter (root diameter) were calculated by the software. The multi framed (MF) version of the software allowed for adjustments based on the new root growth pattern by importing the previous scoring of a tube location. This maintained uniformity and avoided subjective bias in scoring. Root measurements were combined over the following depths: 0-15 cm, 15-30 cm, 30-45 cm, 45-60 cm, and 60-75 cm.

Statistical Analysis

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed using general linear model (GLM) to evaluate the main effects of treatments and their interaction with yr (SAS Institute, 2011). A three yr combined ANOVA in many instances indicated significant yr effects and treatment x yr interactions therefore the data was reanalyzed by yr and summarized for each yr separately. Fisher's protected LSD test with 𝜶 = 0.05 was used for determining statistical differences among treatment means following each ANOVA.

Results and Discussion

Significant differences in root traits from yr to yr were observed but no yr x grazing treatment interaction was observed for root length, root diameter, and root surface area. However, significant yr x grazing treatment interaction was observed for root volume. Significant treatment effects (P ≤ 0.05) were observed on root length, volume and surface area in 2007 and all root parameters in 2008 (P ≤ 0.001). However, in 2009, the trends were similar but the differences in root parameters were non-significant.

The mini-rhizotron method allowed in situ measurements of these root parameters at several depths over time as compared to other methods which were disruptive, labor intensive, and destructive in nature (Ingram and Leers, 2001). Root length across all the depths and dates was greater in the grazed plots by 71% and 180% in comparison to the non-grazed plots in yr 2007 and 2008, respectively (Table 2). Similarly, root volume increased by 82% and 300%, root surface area increased by 72% and 229%, and root diameter increased by 16% and 78% in the grazed plots in comparison to the non-grazed plots in 2007 and 2008, respectively (Table 2). These root parameters were also numerically higher in the grazed plots in 2009 but the difference with the non-grazed plots were not significant (Table 2). These results confirm that grazing impacted the subsequent peanut crop's root characteristics in the two of three study yr.

Table 2.
Table 2.

Treatment and yr effect on total root length, total root volume, total root surface area, and average root diameter of peanut in grazed (G) and non-grazed (NG) plots.

Grazing did not impact the root characteristics in the 0-15 cm and 15-30 cm depth (Table 3). However, significant differences in root characteristics were observed in grazed and non-grazed plots at lower depths. Root length and root diameter were significantly higher in the grazed plots when compared to the non-grazed plots at depth of 45-60 cm and 60-75 cm (Table 3). Root length increased by 204% and 179% and root diameter increased by 117% and 95% in the grazed plots when compared to the non-grazed plots at depths of 45-60 cm and 60-75 cm, respectively (Table 3). Root volume and root surface area values were higher in the grazed plots as compared to the non-grazed plots at the soil depths of 30-45 cm, 45-60 cm, and 60-75 cm (Table 3). In the grazed plots, root length, root volume, and root surface area were greater at the soil depths of 30-45 cm and 45-60 cm as compared to the shallower depths. However, in the non-grazed plots such differences in the root parameters at different depths were not observed (Table 3). As previously noted in cotton by Loison et al. (2012) grazing did not negatively impact root traits in the top soil due to soil compaction. In a related study on peanut in 2009, a slight increase in bulk density was observed at 0-5 cm in the grazed plots as compared to the non-grazed plots. The bulk density was 1.21, 1.44, 1.58 g/cm3 in non-grazed and 1.26, 1.33, and 1.48 g/cm3 in grazed plots at 0-5, 15-20, amd 35-40 cm , respectively. Root growth in the grazed treatments may have been encouraged by more efficient nutrient cycling due to cattle grazing. Wright et al. (2010) demonstrated a 3 to 5 fold increase in the nitrate content in the top 20 cm of the soil in the grazed plots.

Table 3.
Table 3.

Soil depth effect on total root length, total root volume, total root surface area, and average root diameter of peanut in grazed (G) and non-grazed (NG) plots.

The development of the peanut root system in the grazed and non-grazed plots was evaluated by assessing root characteristics at different sampling dates. Root characteristics averaged over different depths and yr showed significant effects of prior grazing on subsequent peanut crop roots at each sampling date. The root length increased linearly and was significantly different from June to August in grazed plots, and from June to July in non-grazed plots (Table 4). However, significant differences in root length were observed from June to August and June to July in grazed and non-grazed plots, respectively (Table 4). A significant increase in root diameter was observed in the grazed plots from June to July but not later sampling dates. No significant increase in root volume and root surface area in the grazed plots were observed at different sampling dates. A rapid root development in the grazed treatments seems to be responsible for the non-significant increase of the root characteristics over time. Root length and root volume in the grazed treatment were significantly higher than the non-grazed treatment at sampling dates of June, August, and September (Table 4). Root diameter and root surface area were significantly higher in grazed plots in comparison to non-grazed plots from July to September and from June to September, respectively (Table 4).

Table 4.
Table 4.

Total root length, total root volume, total root surface area, and average root diameter of peanut at different sampling dates in grazed (G) and non-grazed (NG) plots.

The average peanut yield over the 3 yr period of this study was 5316 kg/ha and 5592 kg/ha in the grazed and non-grazed treatments, respectively, indicating that grazing does not have an adverse effect on crop yield. Increased root growth may have resulted in increased vegetative growth without influencing harvest index, although this was not investigated. Junjittakarn et al. (2014) indicated that root traits are not significantly correlated to harvest index or peanut pod dry weight. Moreover, a water limiting situation would perhaps have increased the significance of enhanced root development on crop yield.

We have also reported the effect of grazing bahiagrass and winter annuals on soil physical and chemical properties such as increased volumetric water content, reduced or comparable bulk density and greater N, P, and K cycling in the top 30 cm depth in the grazed treatments as compared to non-grazed treatments (George et al. 2013). Organic matter in grazed treatments was also greater than non-grazed plots (George et al., 2013). Efficient nutrient recycling as well as decomposing soil organic matter may be more readily available as sources of nutrients in a grazed treatment relative to non-grazed treatments, thereby driving greater root growth and development. Watt et al. (2005), McNeill et al. (1999), Khan et al. (2001), and Nuruzzaman et al. (2005) have all suggested the theory of root-root interaction where actively growing crop roots gravitate toward dead roots from the previous crop seeking nitrogen and phosphorus. A greater root residue in peanuts from grazed plots will therefore contribute to nutrient availability to subsequent crops, usually cotton, in the cropping systems prevalent in the region.

Acknowledgements

We thank Brendan Zurweller, Kathy Gray, John Gardner, John Hinson, Jess Bolton, Maynard Douglas, and Kelly O'Brien for help in min-rhizotron tube installation and image acquisition.

Literature Cited

V., Acosta-Martinez, T.M. Zobeck, and V. Allen (2004).  Soil microbial, chemical and physical properties in continuous cotton and integrated crop-livestock systems.  Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J 68: 1875- 1884.

G., Anguelov, I. Anguelova, and N.O. Bailey (2011).  Land-use impact on soil solution constituents from an Ultisol of North Florida. Nutr. Cycl.  Agroecosys 90: 171- 187.

L.W., Bell, J.A. Kirkegaard, A. Swan, J.R. Hunt, N.I. Huth, and N.A. Fettell (2011).  Impacts of soil damage by grazing livestock on crop productivity. Soil Till.  Res 133: 19- 29.

Brenneman, T.B., T. Timper, N.A Minton, and A.W. Johnson 2003 Comparison of bahiagrass, corn, and cotton as rotational crops for peanut In: F.M. Rhoads (ed.) Proc. of Sod-Based Cropping Systems Conf., Quincy, FL. 20-21 Feb. 2003 NFREC, Quincy, FL 59- 65.

A.E., Clark, (2004).  Benefits of re-integrating livestock and forages in crop production systems.  J. Crop Improv 12: 405- 436.

Elkins, C.B., R.L. Harland, and C.S. Hoveland 1977 Grass roots as a tool for penetrating hardpans and increasing crop yields Proc. 34th Southern Pature and Forage Crop Improvement Conf. Auburn, AL, pp 21- 26.

Entz, M.H., W.D. Bellotti, J.M. Powell, S.V. Angadi, W. Chen, K.H. Ominski, and B. Boelt 2005 Evolution of integrated crop-livestock production systems In: McGilloway, D.A. (Ed.), Grassland: A Global Resource Wageningen Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp 137- 148.

A.J. Franzluebbers, and J.A. Stuedemann (2008).  Soil physical responses to cattle grazing cover crops under conventional and no tillage in the Southern Piedmont USA. Soil Till.  Res 100: 141- 153.

A.J., Franzluebbers, (2007).  Integrated crop-livestock systems in the southeastern USA. Agron.  J 99, 361- 372.

S., George, D.L. Wright, and J.J. Marois (2013).  Impact of grazing on soil properties and cotton yield in an integrated crop-livestock system.  Soil Tillage Res 132: 47- 55.

J.D., Hanson, and A.J. Franzluebbers (2008).  Principles of integrated agricultural systems.  Renewable Agric. Food Syst 23: 263- 264.

K. Ingram, and G. Leers (2001).  Software for measuring root characters from digital images. Agron.  J 93: 918- 922.

J., Junjittakarn, T. Girdthai, S. Jogloy, N. Vorasoot, and A. Patanothai (2014).  Response of root characteristics and yield in peanut under terminal drought condition.  Chilean J. Agric. Res 74: 249- 256.

T.W., Katsvairo, D.L. Wright, J.J. Marois, D.L. Hartzog, J.R. Rich, and P.J. Wiatrak (2006).  Sod-livestock integration into the peanut-cotton rotation: A systems farming approach. Agron.  J 98: 1156- 1171.

Katsvairo, T.W., D.L. Wright, J.J. Marois, D.L. Hartzog, K.B. Balkcom, P.P. Wiatrak, and J.R. Rich 2007 a Performance of peanut and cotton in a bahiagrass cropping system. Agron J 99: 1245- 1251.

Katsvairo, T.W., D.L. Wright, J.J. Marois, D.L. Hartzog, K.B. Balkcom, P.P. Wiatrak, and J.R. Rich 2007 b Cotton roots, earthworms, and infiltration characteristics in sod-peanut-cotton cropping systems. Agron J 99: 390- 398.

Khan, D.F., D.F. Herridge, G.D. Schwenke, D. Chen, M.B. Peoples 2001 The application of 15N-shoot labeling techniques to field-grown crops to study the decomposition and fate of shoot or root residue N in a legume-cereal rotation. In 11th Nitrogen Workshop Book of Abstracts France: INRA, 121-122.

M. Liebman, and E. Dyck (1993).  Crop-rotation and intercropping strategies for weed management.  Ecol. Appl 3: 92- 122.

Loison, R., D. Rowland, W. Faircloth, J.J. Marois, D. L. Wright, and S. George 2012 Cattle grazing affects cotton root dimensions and yields in bahiagrass-based crop rotation Crop Manag doi:10.1094/CM-2012-0925-02-RS.

J.J. Marois, (2003).  Systems of crop rotation and integrated disease management.  In: Congresso Brasileiro de Fitopatologia, XXXVI, Uberlândia, Fitopatologia Brasileira 28: S86.

Marois, J.J., D.L. Wright, J.A. Baldwin, and D.L. Hartzog 2002 A multi-state project to sustain peanut and cotton yields by incorporating cattle and sod in a sod-based rotation, In: E.V. Santen (ed.) Proceedings 25th Annual Southern Conservation Tillage Conference for Sustainable Agriculture, Auburn, Alabama. June 24-26, 2002 101- 107.

M.W., Maughan, J.P.C. Flores, I. Anghinoni, G. Bollero, F.G. Fernandez, and B.F. Tracy (2009).  Soil quality and corn yield under crop-livestock integration in Illinois. Agron.  J 101: 1503- 1510.

McNeill, A., M. Unkovich, C. Zhu, T. Pinchand 1999 The N benefit from above-ground and below-ground legume crop residues In: : The Twelfth Australian Nitrogen Fixation Conference Book of Abstracts Australia: The Australian Society for Nitrogen Fixation, 99-100.

M., Nuruzzaman, H. Lambers, M.D.A. Bolland, E.J. Veneklaas (2005).  Phosphorus benefits of different legume crops to subsequent wheat grown in different soils of Western Australia.  Plant and Soil 271: 175- 187.

G. Patena, and K.T. Ingram (2000).  Digital acquisition and measurement of peanut root minirhizotron images. Agron.  J 92: 541- 544.

D. Reeves, (1997).  The role of soil organic matter in maintaining soil quality in continuous cropping systems.  Soil Tillage Res 43: 131- 167.

SAS Institute Inc 2011 The SAS system for windows. Release 9.4 SAS Inst., Cary, NC.

Sumner, D.R. 1982 Crop rotation and plant productivity In: M. Recheigl (ed) CRC Handbook of Agricultural Productivity, Vol. I CRC Press, Florida 273- 313.

M., Swift, A. Izac, and M. Van Noordwijk (2004).  Biodiversity and ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes - are we asking the right questions?.  Agric. Ecosyst. Environ 104: 113- 134.

D.L., Tanaka, J.F., Karn, M.A., Liebig, S.L., Kronberg, J.D., Hanson, (2005).  An integrated approach to crop/livestock systems: Forage and grain production for swath grazing.  Renewable Agric. Food Syst 20: 223- 231.

Toth, S.J., Jr 1998 Peanut pesticide use survey in North Carolina. Data report to the USDA NAPIAP North Carolina Coop. Ext. Serv., Raleigh, NC.

F.K., Tsigbey, J.R. Rich, J.J. Marois, and D.L. Wright (2009).  Effect of bahiagrass on nematode populations in the field and their behavior under greenhouse and laboratory conditions.  Nematropica 39: 111- 119.

J.M.B., Vendramini, M.L.A., Silveira, J.C.B., Dubeux, and L.E. Sollenberger, (2007).  Environmental impacts and nutrient recycling on pasture grazed by cattle.  Rev. Bras. Zootecn, Suplemento Especial 36: 139- 148.

M., Watt, J.A. Kirkegaard, G.J. Rebetzke (2005).  A wheat genotype developed for rapid leaf growth copes well with the physical and biological constraints of unploughed soil.  Funct. Plant Biol 32: 695- 706.

Wright, D., J. Marois, T. Katsvairo, P. Wiatrak, and J. Rich 2005 Sod-based rotations - the next step after conservation tillage In: Busscher, W.; Frederick, J (eds) Proceedings of the 27th Southern Conservation Tillage Systems Conference, Florence, South Carolina, USA, 27-29 June 5- 12.

Wright, D.L., J.J. Marois, and G. Anguelov 2010 Impacts of grazing winter annuals on the following cotton crop. Unpublished report.

Wright, D.L., J.J. Marois, and T.W. Katsvairo 2007 Bahiagrass impacts on cotton in a peanut/cotton rotation In: S. Boyd, M. Huffman, D. Richter, and B. Robertson (eds.) Proceedings Beltwide Cotton Production Research Conference, National Cotton Council of America, January 9-12, 2007, New Orleans, Louisiana 1770- 1774.

Wright, D.L., B. Tilman, I.M. Small, J.A. Farrel, and N. DuFault 2016 Management and cultural practices for peanuts University of Florida, IFAS Extension http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdffiles/AA/AA25800.pdf (accessed 31 May 2018).

Notes

    Author Affiliations

  1. University of Florida, North Florida Research and Education Center, Quincy, FL 32351 [^]
  2. University of Florida, Department of Agronomy, 304 Newell Hall, Gainesville, FL 32611 [^]
  3. Syngenta, 149 Fairethorne Drive, Leesburg, GA 31763. [^]
  4. *Corresponding author: s.sidhu@ufl.edu