ARTICLES

Cercospora Leafspot Management Decisions: An Economic Analysis of a Weather-Based Strategy for Timing Fungicide Applications1,2

Authors: C. S Johnson , P. M Phipps , M. K Beute

  • Cercospora Leafspot Management Decisions: An Economic Analysis of a Weather-Based Strategy for Timing Fungicide Applications1,2

    ARTICLES

    Cercospora Leafspot Management Decisions: An Economic Analysis of a Weather-Based Strategy for Timing Fungicide Applications1,2

    Authors: , ,

Abstract

The average savings in peanut leafspot control costs from use of the Virginia leafspot advisory program versus the conventional 14-day application schedule ranged from 70.95/ha for cupric hydroxide plus sulfur to 97.39/ha for benomyl plus sulfur in 19801983. Increases in net returns from use of benomyl plus sulfur, chlorothalonil, or cupric hydroxide plus sulfur with the leafspot advisory were attributed to increases in yield as well as decreased control costs. Average annual increases in net return from use of the advisory in comparison to standard 14-day programs of the same fungicides were 259.99, 200.21, 192.55, and 220.57/ha for 1980, 1981, 1982, and 1983, respectively. Annual variation in economic returns was similar for all fungicides and for both application schedules tested.

Full Article Available as PDF only - Use Download Feature

Keywords: Budget analysis, disease forecast models, disease management, epidemiology

How to Cite:

Johnson, C. & Phipps, P. & Beute, M., (1985) “Cercospora Leafspot Management Decisions: An Economic Analysis of a Weather-Based Strategy for Timing Fungicide Applications1,2”, Peanut Science 12(2), p.82-85. doi: https://doi.org/10.3146/pnut.12.2.0009

27 Views

16 Downloads

Published on
01 Jul 1985
Peer Reviewed

Author Notes

1Paper No. 9856 of the Journal Series of the North Carolina Agricultural Research Service, Raleigh, N. C. 276957601.

2The use of trade names in this publication does not imply endorsement by the North Carolina Agricutural Research Service of the products named, nor criticism of similar ones not mentioned.